An Adjudication Between Avicenna, Ghazālī, and Moad on the Second Avicennian Argument
This article examines Ghazālī’s critique of Avicenna’s second argument for the eternity of the world, as presented in Tahāfut al-falāsifa. While prior scholarship has addressed this debate, it often relies solely on Ghazālī’s rendition of Avicenna’s argument, which omits key details. To rectify this...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| In: |
Theology and science
Jahr: 2025, Band: 23, Heft: 3, Seiten: 656-674 |
| IxTheo Notationen: | BJ Islam KAE Kirchengeschichte 900-1300; Hochmittelalter NBC Gotteslehre VA Philosophie |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1932784187 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20251204121229.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250807s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/14746700.2025.2514314 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1932784187 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1932784187 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dadikhuda, Davlat |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a An Adjudication Between Avicenna, Ghazālī, and Moad on the Second Avicennian Argument |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2025 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article examines Ghazālī’s critique of Avicenna’s second argument for the eternity of the world, as presented in Tahāfut al-falāsifa. While prior scholarship has addressed this debate, it often relies solely on Ghazālī’s rendition of Avicenna’s argument, which omits key details. To rectify this, the article first reconstructs Avicenna’s original argument, highlighting its nuances. It then defends the argument where necessary against Ghazālī’s objections. Finally, it evaluates a contemporary interpretation that supports Ghazālī’s critique, offering a critical analysis of its conclusions. | ||
| 601 | |a Avicenna | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 652 | |a BJ:KAE:NBC:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Theology and science |d Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003 |g 23(2025), 3, Seite 656-674 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)372546447 |w (DE-600)2124364-5 |w (DE-576)261325019 |x 1474-6719 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2025 |g number:3 |g pages:656-674 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2025.2514314 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4754739175 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1932784187 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20251204121229 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250807||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-08-06#FB7DA92C21431973C09F1E9C9C4B80494F1973DF | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044462 |a KAE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043539 |a BJ | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
