Transcending Ibn Rushd’s methods of reasoning
Ibn Rushd presents different methods of reasoning. Each method differs in terms of its construction, level of assent, and the cognitive state it ultimately produces. Despite these technical variations, notable authors suggest that they are all equally valid and sound. I analyse this claim, and argue...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| In: |
Asian philosophy
Jahr: 2025, Band: 35, Heft: 3, Seiten: 236-268 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
methods of reasoning
B Islam B fuzzy logic B Ibn Rushd B Truth |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1932067582 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250730085905.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250730s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/09552367.2024.2403816 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1932067582 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1932067582 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1200877128 |0 (DE-627)1683874315 |4 aut |a Ahsan, Abbas |d ca. 20./21. Jh. | |
| 109 | |a Ahsan, Abbas ca. 20./21. Jh. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Transcending Ibn Rushd’s methods of reasoning |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2025 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Ibn Rushd presents different methods of reasoning. Each method differs in terms of its construction, level of assent, and the cognitive state it ultimately produces. Despite these technical variations, notable authors suggest that they are all equally valid and sound. I analyse this claim, and argue that although demonstrative and dialectical arguments are both valid and sound, there is a theoretical discrepancy between the two. Subsequently, I explore how underscoring this issue would motivate a non-classical/many-valued logic and a plurality of truth in being able to make sense of the theoretical discrepancy. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Islam | |
| 650 | 4 | |a fuzzy logic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Truth | |
| 650 | 4 | |a methods of reasoning | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ibn Rushd | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Asian philosophy |d London [u.a.] : Carfax, 1991 |g 35(2025), 3, Seite 236-268 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320310922 |w (DE-600)2025427-1 |w (DE-576)094080704 |x 1469-2961 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2025 |g number:3 |g pages:236-268 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2024.2403816 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4750663379 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1932067582 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250730055512 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250730||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-07-29#1E96B6A9D89E5884E4101F4FAF809660C789233D | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Islam,Islam |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Islam,Islam |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Islam,Islam |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Islam,Islam |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 伊斯兰教,伊斯兰教,回教,回教 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 伊斯蘭教,伊斯蘭教,回教,回教 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Islã,Islã |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Ислам (мотив),Ислам |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ισλάμ (μοτίβο),Ισλάμ |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Islam |