Transcending Ibn Rushd’s methods of reasoning

Ibn Rushd presents different methods of reasoning. Each method differs in terms of its construction, level of assent, and the cognitive state it ultimately produces. Despite these technical variations, notable authors suggest that they are all equally valid and sound. I analyse this claim, and argue...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Ahsan, Abbas ca. 20./21. Jh. (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2025
In: Asian philosophy
Jahr: 2025, Band: 35, Heft: 3, Seiten: 236-268
weitere Schlagwörter:B methods of reasoning
B Islam
B fuzzy logic
B Ibn Rushd
B Truth
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1932067582
003 DE-627
005 20250730085905.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250730s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09552367.2024.2403816  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1932067582 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1932067582 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1200877128  |0 (DE-627)1683874315  |4 aut  |a Ahsan, Abbas  |d ca. 20./21. Jh. 
109 |a Ahsan, Abbas ca. 20./21. Jh. 
245 1 0 |a Transcending Ibn Rushd’s methods of reasoning 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Ibn Rushd presents different methods of reasoning. Each method differs in terms of its construction, level of assent, and the cognitive state it ultimately produces. Despite these technical variations, notable authors suggest that they are all equally valid and sound. I analyse this claim, and argue that although demonstrative and dialectical arguments are both valid and sound, there is a theoretical discrepancy between the two. Subsequently, I explore how underscoring this issue would motivate a non-classical/many-valued logic and a plurality of truth in being able to make sense of the theoretical discrepancy. 
650 4 |a Islam 
650 4 |a fuzzy logic 
650 4 |a Truth 
650 4 |a methods of reasoning 
650 4 |a Ibn Rushd 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Asian philosophy  |d London [u.a.] : Carfax, 1991  |g 35(2025), 3, Seite 236-268  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320310922  |w (DE-600)2025427-1  |w (DE-576)094080704  |x 1469-2961  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:35  |g year:2025  |g number:3  |g pages:236-268 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2024.2403816  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4750663379 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1932067582 
LOK |0 005 20250730055512 
LOK |0 008 250730||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-07-29#1E96B6A9D89E5884E4101F4FAF809660C789233D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Islam,Islam 
STB 0 0 |a Islam,Islam 
STC 0 0 |a Islam,Islam 
STD 0 0 |a Islam,Islam 
STE 0 0 |a 伊斯兰教,伊斯兰教,回教,回教 
STF 0 0 |a 伊斯蘭教,伊斯蘭教,回教,回教 
STG 0 0 |a Islã,Islã 
STH 0 0 |a Ислам (мотив),Ислам 
STI 0 0 |a Ισλάμ (μοτίβο),Ισλάμ 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Islam