The court stories of Joseph (Gen 41) and Daniel (Dan 2) in canonical context : a theological paradigm for God's work among the nations
This article asserts that the canonical context of the accounts of Joseph in Gen 41 and Daniel in Dan 2 creates a paradigm for how Israel's God uses his people among the nations, where they spend the majority of their history. It begins by considering critical scholarship on the "court sto...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2014
|
| Dans: |
Old Testament essays
Année: 2014, Volume: 27, Numéro: 3, Pages: 1112-1128 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Canonical context
B Narrative B Joseph B Daniel B Theological significance B Court stories |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | This article asserts that the canonical context of the accounts of Joseph in Gen 41 and Daniel in Dan 2 creates a paradigm for how Israel's God uses his people among the nations, where they spend the majority of their history. It begins by considering critical scholarship on the "court stories" of Joseph and Daniel. Then it evaluates each account in its own narrative context before comparing and contrasting the two narratives. Finally, it explores the canonical context of the two accounts and their theological significance in the narrative of the OT, as well as the implications of this theological significance in the NT. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2312-3621 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Old Testament essays
|
| Persistent identifiers: | HDL: 10520/EJC163479 |
