The Seriousness of Mistakes and the Benefits of Getting it Right: Symmetries and Asymmetries in the Ethics of Epistemic Risk Management

Scientists have to make trade-offs between different types of error risks when making methodological decisions. It is now widely recognized (and not disputed in this article) that in doing so they must consider how serious the consequences of each error would be. The fact that they must also conside...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wilholt, Torsten (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Year: 2024, Volume: 34, Issue: 4, Pages: 419-437
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1931343837
003 DE-627
005 20250720055506.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250720s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1353/ken.2024.a965815  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1931343837 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1931343837 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wilholt, Torsten  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Seriousness of Mistakes and the Benefits of Getting it Right: Symmetries and Asymmetries in the Ethics of Epistemic Risk Management 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Scientists have to make trade-offs between different types of error risks when making methodological decisions. It is now widely recognized (and not disputed in this article) that in doing so they must consider how serious the consequences of each error would be. The fact that they must also consider the potential benefits of getting it right is not equally recognized (and explicitly rejected by Heather Douglas). In this article, I argue that scientists need to do both when managing epistemic risks. At the same time, I acknowledge that in some cases it intuitively seems as if considering the consequences of possible errors carries greater moral weight. I explain this intuition by arguing that in these cases the contrast between the seriousness of mistakes and the benefits of getting it right can be linked to the moral asymmetry between action and omission. I examine various reasons that might justify a stronger weighting of the consideration of the consequences of errors in light of the action-omission asymmetry. I conclude that for all but some exceptional cases, such asymmetrical consideration is not called for. 
601 |a Symmetrie 
601 |a Asymmetrie 
601 |a Episteme 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Kennedy Institute of Ethics  |t Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal  |d Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1991  |g 34(2024), 4, Seite 419-437  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320481840  |w (DE-600)2009887-X  |w (DE-576)266818668  |x 1086-3249  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2024  |g number:4  |g pages:419-437 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2024.a965815  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/965815  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4748147822 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1931343837 
LOK |0 005 20250720055506 
LOK |0 008 250720||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-07-19#034EC665566E39A9058067EAC3962774B4F624A0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw