From Polemical to Dialogical Encounter: The Significance of Pluralism in Contemporary Ahmadi Muslim-Christian Relations

In 1902, Ghulam Ahmad, the Indo-Pakistani founder of the Ahmadiyah Muslim Community—a revivalist, messianic movement within Sunni Islam—issued "an answer" to John Alexander Dowie’s, the Scottish-born non-denominationalist Christian preacher and forerunner of modern-day Pentecostalism’s, im...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Haworth, Marcus Timothy (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2024
Dans: Interreligious studies and intercultural theology
Année: 2024, Volume: 8, Numéro: 1, Pages: 19-39
Sujets non-standardisés:B Interfaith Understanding
B Ghulām Aḥmad
B John Alexander Dowie
B Aḥmadī Muslim-Christian Relations
B Interreligious Dialogue
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:In 1902, Ghulam Ahmad, the Indo-Pakistani founder of the Ahmadiyah Muslim Community—a revivalist, messianic movement within Sunni Islam—issued "an answer" to John Alexander Dowie’s, the Scottish-born non-denominationalist Christian preacher and forerunner of modern-day Pentecostalism’s, impassioned renunciation of the Islamic faith. In doing so, Ahmad invited Dowie to engage him in a mubahala, or a "prayer duel" to the death, to determine the truthfulness or fallacy of each other’s faith expression. With Dowie’s subsequent passing in 1907, Ahmad’s presumed "great victory" became one of the foundational narratives upon which Ahmadi Muslims constructed the validity of the Ahmadiyah and, consequently, structured their relationship with Christians. In this article, I explore the general contours of this mubahala invitation as well as Ahmadis differing responses to its historical and contemporaneous narrativization. Due to increased contact between Ahmadis and Christians living in the West, I contend that Ahmadi narratives surrounding this event, while historically polemical in nature, ultimately became the cornerstone upon which a positive and constructive Ahmadi Muslim-Christian engagement could be fostered, namely one built on shared collegiality and reciprocal, interfaith understanding garnered through deep, pluralistic encounter.
ISSN:2397-348X
Contient:Enthalten in: Interreligious studies and intercultural theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1558/isit.26564