Rewriting Australia's Racist Past: How Historians (Mis)Interpret the ‘White Australia’ Policy

This article examines recent writing on the ‘White Australia’ policy and its origins in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. For the most part, this body of work falls into two distinct and opposing categories. On the one hand, historians who take an ‘essentialist’ approach to the prob...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jordan, Matthew (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2005
In: History compass
Year: 2005, Volume: 3, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-32
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1928534228
003 DE-627
005 20250618132224.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250618s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1478-0542.2005.00164.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1928534228 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1928534228 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Jordan, Matthew  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Rewriting Australia's Racist Past: How Historians (Mis)Interpret the ‘White Australia’ Policy 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article examines recent writing on the ‘White Australia’ policy and its origins in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. For the most part, this body of work falls into two distinct and opposing categories. On the one hand, historians who take an ‘essentialist’ approach to the problem view ‘White Australia’ as a natural and inevitable by-product of Anglo-Australian racism, which, they argue, permeated Australian culture from the moment the British invaded the continent. Believing that Australian racism thus has something of an ‘inherent’ quality about it, these historians often regard any harsh or unfair decision in the immigration arena as prima facie evidence for the ‘White Australia’ policy's continuing ‘legacy’. On the other hand, ‘apologists’ for ‘White Australia’ deny that it was ever a racist policy and suggest instead that it was a sensible and at the time progressive attempt on the part of its founders to protect Australian economic standards, political conventions and cultural norms from people with vastly different attitudes and ways of life. It is the contention of this article that both interpretations succumb to an ahistorical perspective which ignores the particular ideas and circumstances that led to the policy's formal adoption in 1901. In arguing this case, it also offers a new interpretation which suggests that the rise at this time of race nationalism in Australia provides a more credible explanation for the Commonwealth's decision to embrace the principle of ‘White Australia’. 
601 |a Interpretation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t History compass  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 2003  |g 3(2005), 1, Artikel-ID AU 164, Seite 1-32  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)509401244  |w (DE-600)2227219-7  |w (DE-576)306833107  |x 1478-0542  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:3  |g year:2005  |g number:1  |g elocationid:AU 164  |g pages:1-32 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2005.00164.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2005.00164.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4735852735 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1928534228 
LOK |0 005 20250618113620 
LOK |0 008 250618||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw