Co-existential justice and individual freedom: the primary concern and the normative foundation of global ethics
In the discussion of global ethics, philosophical ethics risks losing its distinct theoretical horizons. This predicament arises primarily from philosophy's failure to anchor its own object and to provide a rational basis for global justice from within its current confined theoretical paradigm....
| Altri titoli: | 20th Anniversary Forum |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| In: |
Journal of global ethics
Anno: 2025, Volume: 21, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 114-122 |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
co-existential justice
B individual freedom B Hegel B ontological justice B Global Ethics B Hans Jonas B Kant |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1928509924 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20251202140448.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250618s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/17449626.2024.2448115 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1928509924 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1928509924 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Deng, An-qing |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Co-existential justice and individual freedom: the primary concern and the normative foundation of global ethics |
| 246 | 1 | |i Special Issue |a 20th Anniversary Forum | |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2025 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In the discussion of global ethics, philosophical ethics risks losing its distinct theoretical horizons. This predicament arises primarily from philosophy's failure to anchor its own object and to provide a rational basis for global justice from within its current confined theoretical paradigm. Against this background, this paper will first prioritize global co-existence as the primary concern of global ethics, then propose ontological co-existence justice as its foundational principle, and finally argue that the normative validity of co-existence justice is predicated on the nations fulfilling the critical requirements of modern civilization, namely, the advancement of individual freedom. | ||
| 601 | |a Individuation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Hegel | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Kant | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hans Jonas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a individual freedom | |
| 650 | 4 | |a co-existential justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ontological justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Global Ethics | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of global ethics |d London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 |g 21(2025), 1, Seite 114-122 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)506719197 |w (DE-600)2219472-1 |w (DE-576)378913263 |x 1744-9634 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2025 |g number:1 |g pages:114-122 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2024.2448115 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4735777326 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1928509924 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20251202140448 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250618||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-06-17#680D7BCAF1AC9DB932971E9A6D42C2FA9E9B5235 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x zotak: Ergänzt (4212), da in zota-Einspielung nicht vorhanden | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 18-06-25 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
