Co-existential justice and individual freedom: the primary concern and the normative foundation of global ethics
In the discussion of global ethics, philosophical ethics risks losing its distinct theoretical horizons. This predicament arises primarily from philosophy's failure to anchor its own object and to provide a rational basis for global justice from within its current confined theoretical paradigm....
| Autres titres: | 20th Anniversary Forum |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2025
|
| Dans: |
Journal of global ethics
Année: 2025, Volume: 21, Numéro: 1, Pages: 114-122 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
co-existential justice
B individual freedom B Hegel B ontological justice B Global Ethics B Hans Jonas B Kant |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | In the discussion of global ethics, philosophical ethics risks losing its distinct theoretical horizons. This predicament arises primarily from philosophy's failure to anchor its own object and to provide a rational basis for global justice from within its current confined theoretical paradigm. Against this background, this paper will first prioritize global co-existence as the primary concern of global ethics, then propose ontological co-existence justice as its foundational principle, and finally argue that the normative validity of co-existence justice is predicated on the nations fulfilling the critical requirements of modern civilization, namely, the advancement of individual freedom. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1744-9634 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of global ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2024.2448115 |
