Did the Shapira manuscript betray an unambiguously Pentateuchal perspective?: A rejoinder to Stackert
Jeffrey Stackert sees signs that the Shapira manuscript responds to a compiled Pentateuch, which suggests to him that it cannot be the proto-biblical book that Idan Dershowitz claims. We find that Stackert’s conclusions overlook the possibility of independent scrolls or traditions circulating separa...
| Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | ; |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
2025
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Έτος: 2025, Τόμος: 49, Τεύχος: 4, Σελίδες: 449-459 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Hebrew Bible
B Literary Dependency B Priestly Writings B Pentateuch B Biblical compilation |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Σύνοψη: | Jeffrey Stackert sees signs that the Shapira manuscript responds to a compiled Pentateuch, which suggests to him that it cannot be the proto-biblical book that Idan Dershowitz claims. We find that Stackert’s conclusions overlook the possibility of independent scrolls or traditions circulating separately for an extended period before the canonical Pentateuchal compilation. We also present an example drawn from the Midianite episode (Num. 25) to show that the manuscript may have, in fact, been drawn from an earlier version of the canonical Pentateuch. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/03090892251332294 |
