Entailment Is Not Evidence

Mike Almeida recently published a paper entitled "Evil Is Not Evidence," but that title rather understates his conclusion. He argues that no "states of affairs constitute any (non-trivial) evidence for or against the existence of God" (p. 1, original emphasis) (bare page referenc...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Reed, Thomas (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Опубликовано: 2025
В: Sophia
Год: 2025, Том: 64, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 263-274
Другие ключевые слова:B Epistemology
B Formal Reasoning
B Reasoning
B Empiricism
B Evidence
B problem of evil
B Metaphysics
B Modal logic
B God
B Philosophical Logic
Online-ссылка: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1927434793
003 DE-627
005 20250604095010.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250604s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11841-024-01056-4  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1927434793 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1927434793 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Reed, Thomas  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0001-6918-6200  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Entailment Is Not Evidence 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Mike Almeida recently published a paper entitled "Evil Is Not Evidence," but that title rather understates his conclusion. He argues that no "states of affairs constitute any (non-trivial) evidence for or against the existence of God" (p. 1, original emphasis) (bare page references are to Almeida, 2022). It of course follows from that that evil is not evidence against the existence of God, but it also follows that apparent design or even direct experience of God are not non-trivial evidence for the existence of God. While his title suggests a conclusion favorable to theists, it might in fact be a poisoned pawn, since his conclusion also entails that arguments from design or religious experience are completely hopeless. Such a radical transformation of the traditional debate between theists and atheists bears scrutinizing. In particular, Almeida appeals to a notion of evidence that I'm going to argue is mistaken.The basic argument I am going to make is that Almeida is taking strict implication to be an evidentially relevant relation. In particular he's embracing one of the paradoxes of strict implication, that a necessary truth is strictly implied by any claim whatever, and he's assuming that not only is the inference valid, pace relevance logics, but that it provides evidence for the implied proposition. I'm going to argue this is a mistake. Even if we grant that the inference is valid, we shouldn't accept that it provides evidence. 
650 4 |a Empiricism 
650 4 |a Epistemology 
650 4 |a Evidence 
650 4 |a Formal Reasoning 
650 4 |a God 
650 4 |a Metaphysics 
650 4 |a Modal logic 
650 4 |a Philosophical Logic 
650 4 |a problem of evil 
650 4 |a Reasoning 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 64(2025), 2, Seite 263-274  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:64  |g year:2025  |g number:2  |g pages:263-274 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-024-01056-4  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4730897315 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1927434793 
LOK |0 005 20250604094808 
LOK |0 008 250604||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 939   |a 04-06-25  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw