The contradictory god thesis and non-dialetheic mystical contradictory theism
When faced with the charge that a given concept of God is contradictory, the standard move among philosophers and theologians has been to try to explain away the contradiction and show that the concept of God in question is consistent. This has to do, of course, with the Law of Non-Contradiction (LN...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2025
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2025, Volume: 97, Issue: 2, Pages: 83-105 |
| Further subjects: | B
philosophy of religion
B Islamic Theology B Paraconsistent dialetheic theism B Jiva goswami B Comparative Religion B Concept of god B Bhedabheda vedanta B Religious Pluralism B Hindu Theology B Contradictory god thesis |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1927388066 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250603151649.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250603s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-024-09945-x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1927388066 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1927388066 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1249162165 |0 (DE-627)1785423797 |4 aut |a Silvestre, Ricardo Sousa | |
| 109 | |a Silvestre, Ricardo Sousa |a Silvestre Sousa, Ricardo |a Silvestre, Ricardo S. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The contradictory god thesis and non-dialetheic mystical contradictory theism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2025 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a When faced with the charge that a given concept of God is contradictory, the standard move among philosophers and theologians has been to try to explain away the contradiction and show that the concept of God in question is consistent. This has to do, of course, with the Law of Non-Contradiction (LNC). Another option, which has recently generated interest among logicians and analytic philosophers of religion, is to reject such a move as unnecessary and defend what might be called the contradictory God thesis. To be sure, something close to that can be found in philosophers such as Pseudo-Dionysius, Thomas Aquinas and Nicolaus de Cusa. However, it is only recently that this approach has gained momentum, certainly driven by the contemporary advance of dialetheism and glut theoretic approaches in general, and paraconsistent logic. Needless to say, a standard move among defenders of the contradictory God thesis is to challenge the LNC. The argumentation, however, is seldomly framed in conceptual terms. Instead, it is mostly framed in ontological terms, as God being a contradictory entity. From this perspective, the contradictory God thesis is the thesis that God is a contradictory object. My goal in this paper is to provide a conceptual assessment of the discussion surrounding the contradictory God thesis. To achieve this, I make use of a general and hopefully non-controversial meta-theory of concepts and adopt a semantic approach rather than a metaphysical one. Within this framework, I address the following questions: What are the different ways we can understand the contradictory God thesis? What grounds are there for rejecting a contradictory concept of God? What standard moves are available to defend oneself from such criticisms and how do they relate to the LNC? What challenges do they present? As a secondary goal, the paper introduces a novel defense of the contradictory God thesis, drawing on a specific interpretation of the theology of the 16th-century Indian thinker Jīva Gosvāmī, which avoids the need to challenge the LNC. I term this approach ‘non-dialetheic mystical contradictory theism.’ | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Bhedabheda vedanta | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Concept of god | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Contradictory god thesis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hindu Theology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Islamic Theology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jiva goswami | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Paraconsistent dialetheic theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a philosophy of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Pluralism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 97(2025), 2, Seite 83-105 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:97 |g year:2025 |g number:2 |g pages:83-105 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-024-09945-x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4730746929 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1927388066 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250603151300 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250603||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
