RT Article
T1 A Criticism of the Argument for the Possibility of Religious Science
JF Theology and science
VO 23
IS 2
SP 298
OP 304
A1 Taqavi, Mostafa
A1 Poostforush, Maryam
A2 Poostforush, Maryam
LA English
YR 2025
UL https://ixtheo.de/Record/1925896870
AB Having quoted a number of cases from contemporary science, some philosophers have shown that science has naturalistic biases and argued that in his encounter with such a science one can defend the possibility of religious (or Augustinian) science. In this essay we have shown that “argument of the possibility of religious science” can only prove the possibility of “science influenced by religion” not the “possibility of religious science”. To this end, we have studied three issues: I) religious science, II) presuppositions that play a role in the formation of scientific content, and III) those norms that orient empirical data collection.
K1 science influenced by religion
K1 Religious Science
K1 presuppositions of science
K1 empirical science
DO 10.1080/14746700.2025.2472122