Toward a Unified Account of the Intentionality of Mind: The Case of Hervaeus Natalis

Our mental states are considered intentional in that they express a directedness toward something. Mental states include acts of thought and will, acts of consciousness, emotions, and possibly acts of sense perception. Did any medieval philosopher give a unified account of all these acts? In the Mid...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Amerini, Fabrizio 1971- (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2024
In: American catholic philosophical quarterly
Anno: 2024, Volume: 98, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 375-394
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:Our mental states are considered intentional in that they express a directedness toward something. Mental states include acts of thought and will, acts of consciousness, emotions, and possibly acts of sense perception. Did any medieval philosopher give a unified account of all these acts? In the Middle Ages, no author explicitly offers such an account. There is however one author, the Dominican Hervaeus Natalis (†1323), who explains intentionality in a way that allows us to extract from his texts the unified account we are searching for. The key to obtaining this account is to approach intentionality from the side of the thing that is intended. For if we are in relation to things, things, too, are in relation to us. Specifically, Hervaeus holds that intentionality designates a kind of relation, not however the relation ensuing from our directedness toward things (as we are accustomed to understanding it today), but the relation that things bear on us. This is a primitive and radical condition that specifically endows every mental state with intentional character.
ISSN:2153-8441
Comprende:Enthalten in: American catholic philosophical quarterly
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/acpq2025324300