The Promise and Peril of the Spectrum View: Reply to McIntosh

The view of hell proposed by C. A. McIntosh, elsewhere called "the spectrum view," is both promising and important, but I argue that it needs to be qualified; otherwise, it is a perilous thesis. Even in its qualified form, however, the spectrum view faces a problem: it’s not clear that it...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Manis, R. Zachary (Author)
Contributors: McIntosh, C. A. (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Philosophia Christi
Year: 2024, Volume: 26, Issue: 2, Pages: 315-331
IxTheo Classification:NBC Doctrine of God
NBE Anthropology
NBQ Eschatology
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The view of hell proposed by C. A. McIntosh, elsewhere called "the spectrum view," is both promising and important, but I argue that it needs to be qualified; otherwise, it is a perilous thesis. Even in its qualified form, however, the spectrum view faces a problem: it’s not clear that it actually qualifies as a version of traditionalism, as McIntosh claims. I argue that the spectrum view is best construed as a new version of natural consequence annihilationism—one that avoids the major problem of its closest competitors, but also faces problems of its own. I close with a suggestion for how the spectrum view might be strengthened.
ISSN:2640-2580
Reference:Kritik von "Hell and the Image of God (2024)"
Kritik in "From Monsters to Monuments (2024)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Philosophia Christi
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/pc202426225