The Importance of Peer Review: Recommendations for Reviewers and Authors
This editorial provides an overview of the importance of peer reviewing, generally and to the Review of Religious Research journal. Several practical recommendations are offered to reviewers. Following these practices will aid reviewers in communicating their feedback clearly to the editor and havin...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2023
|
| In: |
Review of religious research
Jahr: 2023, Band: 65, Heft: 1, Seiten: 3-6 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Peer Review
B Reciprocity B scientific process B science communication |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1920718184 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250327140923.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250327s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0034673X231178990 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1920718184 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1920718184 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)139843620 |0 (DE-627)61380032X |0 (DE-576)312467141 |4 aut |a Snell Herzog, Patricia |d 1978- | |
| 109 | |a Snell Herzog, Patricia 1978- |a Snell Herzog, P. 1978- |a Snell, Patricia 1978- |a Herzog, Patricia Snell 1978- |a Herzog, Patricia 1978- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Importance of Peer Review: Recommendations for Reviewers and Authors |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This editorial provides an overview of the importance of peer reviewing, generally and to the Review of Religious Research journal. Several practical recommendations are offered to reviewers. Following these practices will aid reviewers in communicating their feedback clearly to the editor and having it received well by authors. Additionally, several practical recommendations are offered to authors. Following these practices will aid authors in successfully responding to reviewers and communicating their thorough and thoughtful revisions. Peer reviewing is an important activity that advances knowledge and supports the academic community. The Review of Religious Research editorial team thanks its reviewers and authors for treating this process with integrity, sincerity, and authenticity. The journal invites experienced and emerging scholars to serve as reviewers. Whether new or experienced, this editorial provides reviewer and author recommendations for a successful process. | ||
| 601 | |a Peer Review | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Peer Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reciprocity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a science communication | |
| 650 | 4 | |a scientific process | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Review of religious research |d London : Sage Publications, 1959 |g 65(2023), 1, Seite 3-6 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)362776326 |w (DE-600)2100833-4 |w (DE-576)257192638 |x 2211-4866 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:65 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g pages:3-6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0034673X231178990 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4694673335 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1920718184 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250327140923 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250327||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 27-03-25 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Peer review |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Évaluation par les pairs |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Revisión paritaria |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Peer review,Revisione paritaria,Revisione paritaria |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Revisão paritária |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Рецензирование |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ομότιμη αναθεώρηση,Peer review,Αναθεώρηση από ομότιμους |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Peer-Review,Kreuzgutachten |
