Justification of principles for healthcare priority setting: the relevance and roles of empirical studies exploring public values
How should scarce healthcare resources be distributed? This is a contentious issue that became especially pressing during the pandemic. It is often emphasised that studies exploring public views about this question provide valuable input to the issue of healthcare priority setting. While there has b...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Jahr: 2025, Band: 51, Heft: 4, Seiten: 285-292 |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1920614915 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250326130705.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250326s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/jme-2022-108702 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1920614915 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1920614915 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gustavsson, Erik |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0001-5448-9209 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Justification of principles for healthcare priority setting: the relevance and roles of empirical studies exploring public values |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2025 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a How should scarce healthcare resources be distributed? This is a contentious issue that became especially pressing during the pandemic. It is often emphasised that studies exploring public views about this question provide valuable input to the issue of healthcare priority setting. While there has been a vast number of such studies it is rarely articulated, more specifically, what the results from these studies would mean for the justification of principles for priority setting. On the one hand, it seems unreasonable that public values would straightforwardly decide the ethical question of how resources should be distributed. On the other hand, in a democratic society, it seems equally unreasonable that they would be considered irrelevant for this question. In this paper we draw on the notion of reflective equilibrium and discuss the relevance and roles that empirical studies may plausibly have for justification in priority setting ethics. We develop a framework for analysing how different kinds of empirical results may have different kinds of implications for justification. | ||
| 601 | |a Public Value | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Lindblom, Lars |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 51(2025), 4, Seite 285-292 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g year:2025 |g number:4 |g pages:285-292 |
| 856 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/early/2023/02/22/jme-2022-108702.full.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [deprecated] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108702 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/51/4/285 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4693565563 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1920614915 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250326125211 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250326||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
