Fictionality, Memory, and Epistemological Ecumenism in Chinua Achebe’s Arrow of God

To the extent that the majority of documentation of the colonial encounter between Christianity and traditional “pagan” religion in West Africa is authored by Christian missionaries, an epistemological perspective that assumes the inherent superiority of Christianity dominates the historical record...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Collins, Jason Emmett (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2025
In: Religion and the arts
Jahr: 2025, Band: 29, Heft: 1/2, Seiten: 87-104
weitere Schlagwörter:B Forgetting
B Literature and religion
B Memory
B Literary Theory
B Postcoloniality
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 192056408X
003 DE-627
005 20250327054808.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250326s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15685292-02901015  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)192056408X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP192056408X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Collins, Jason Emmett  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0009-0008-5414-0638  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Fictionality, Memory, and Epistemological Ecumenism in Chinua Achebe’s Arrow of God 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a To the extent that the majority of documentation of the colonial encounter between Christianity and traditional “pagan” religion in West Africa is authored by Christian missionaries, an epistemological perspective that assumes the inherent superiority of Christianity dominates the historical record of this encounter. This article argues that, in his 1964 novel Arrow of God, Chinua Achebe leverages the discursive qualities unique to fiction to reimagine this historical encounter in an epistemologically ecumenical way. This reimagined perspective enables the reader to circumvent the challenges of the unbalanced historical record. At the same time, however, the very fictionality of the text continually signifies the dearth of similar archival evidence. In this way, Arrow of God is paradoxically both an act of remembering and an act of forgetting: remembering to the extent that it constructs a fascinating and plausible alternative to the biased historical record, and forgetting to the extent that the text’s necessarily imaginative quality continually memorializes the violence of the original erasure. 
601 |a Achebe, Chinua 
650 4 |a Forgetting 
650 4 |a Memory 
650 4 |a Literature and religion 
650 4 |a Literary Theory 
650 4 |a Postcoloniality 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religion and the arts  |d Leiden : Brill, 1996  |g 29(2025), 1/2, Seite 87-104  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)331747022  |w (DE-600)2052614-3  |w (DE-576)09448175X  |x 1568-5292  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2025  |g number:1/2  |g pages:87-104 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/15685292-02901015  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/rart/29/1-2/article-p87_5.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4693167533 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 192056408X 
LOK |0 005 20250326055506 
LOK |0 008 250326||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-03-25#A04E1D82F688D7C8D570358C767F4896A749139B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REF |a Religionstheorie 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL