Appropriating The Cambridge Platform’s Neo-Congregational Polity

This article argues that Baptists can learn, with regard to their practice of governance, from the seventeenth-century Congregational churches of New-England. After showing that The Cambridge Platform of Discipline (1648) offers two accounts of polity, ‘congregational’ and ‘neo-congregational’, it i...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rutherford, J. Alexander (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Ecclesiology
Year: 2025, Volume: 21, Issue: 1, Pages: 80-104
Further subjects:B Baptist theology
B 1689 London Confession
B Neo-Congregationalism
B Ecclesiastical Polity
B Ecclesiology
B 1644 London Confession
B Cambridge Platform of Discipline
B Congregationalism
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This article argues that Baptists can learn, with regard to their practice of governance, from the seventeenth-century Congregational churches of New-England. After showing that The Cambridge Platform of Discipline (1648) offers two accounts of polity, ‘congregational’ and ‘neo-congregational’, it is argued that neo-congregational polity is not only more desirable than congregational polity (as the Platform argued) but offers a more consistent account of biblical ecclesiology. Baptist churches, sharing similar roots and ecclesiology with Congregationalism, stand to benefit from the insights of their seventeenth-century brothers and sisters.
ISSN:1745-5316
Contains:Enthalten in: Ecclesiology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/17455316-bja10050