Tsunami-tendenko follows the antiextinction principle, not utilitarianism

This paper examines the concept of ‘tsunami-tendenko,’ a guideline suggesting that individuals prioritise their own safety over aiding others during large-scale disasters. Kodama defends tsunami-tendenko against accusations of egoism by arguing that the principle can be justified ethically on conseq...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Cato, Susumu (Auteur) ; Oshitani, Ken (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2025
Dans: Journal of medical ethics
Année: 2025, Volume: 51, Numéro: 3, Pages: 203-204
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 191881757X
003 DE-627
005 20250228115023.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250228s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme-2023-109674  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)191881757X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP191881757X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Cato, Susumu  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-4244-7199  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Tsunami-tendenko follows the antiextinction principle, not utilitarianism 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper examines the concept of ‘tsunami-tendenko,’ a guideline suggesting that individuals prioritise their own safety over aiding others during large-scale disasters. Kodama defends tsunami-tendenko against accusations of egoism by arguing that the principle can be justified ethically on consequentialist (or more precisely, utilitarian) grounds. Kodama asserts that attempting to assist others during such disasters heightens the risk of ‘tomo-daore,’ where both the rescuer and the victim may perish. He claims that having people focus solely on saving themselves can maximise the overall number of lives saved. However, we challenge Kodama’s assertion that utilitarianism inherently favours tsunami-tendenko over mutual assistance during disasters. Instead, this paper proposes an alternative ethical foundation for tsunami-tendenko grounded in the ‘antiextinction principle,’ which prioritises minimising the potential for catastrophic outcomes. When considering the ethics of responding to disaster, it is important to distinguish between maximising the number of lives saved (utilitarianism) and minimising the risk of tomo-daore (antiextinction principle). This distinction may be overlooked if the distribution of probabilities is not considered. We conclude that the antiextinction principle aligns more naturally with tsunami-tendenko, emphasising the avoidance of catastrophic outcomes—a concern not always addressed by utilitarianism. Therefore, tsunami-tendenko should be regarded as a societal guideline aimed at preserving community sustainability by averting total destruction. 
700 1 |a Oshitani, Ken  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 51(2025), 3, Seite 203-204  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2025  |g number:3  |g pages:203-204 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109674  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/51/3/203  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4675120601 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 191881757X 
LOK |0 005 20250228115023 
LOK |0 008 250228||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw