A healthcare approach to mental integrity

The current human rights framework can shield people from many of the risks associated with neurotechnological applications. However, it has been argued that we need either to articulate new rights or reconceptualise existing ones in order to prevent some of these risks. In this paper, we would like...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori: Wajnerman-Paz, Abel (Autore) ; Aboitiz, Francisco (Autore) ; Álamos, Florencia (Autore) ; Vergara, Paulina Ramos (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2024
In: Journal of medical ethics
Anno: 2024, Volume: 50, Fascicolo: 10, Pagine: 664-669
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1918788316
003 DE-627
005 20250228113750.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250228s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme-2023-109682  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1918788316 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1918788316 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wajnerman-Paz, Abel  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0003-1551-527X  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A healthcare approach to mental integrity 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The current human rights framework can shield people from many of the risks associated with neurotechnological applications. However, it has been argued that we need either to articulate new rights or reconceptualise existing ones in order to prevent some of these risks. In this paper, we would like to address the recent discussion about whether current reconceptualisations of the right to mental integrity identify an ethical dimension that is not covered by existing moral and/or legal rights. The main challenge of these proposals is that they make mental integrity indistinguishable from autonomy. They define mental integrity in terms of the control we can have over our mental states, which seems to be part of the authenticity condition for autonomous action. Based on a fairly comprehensive notion of mental health (ie, a notion that is not limited to the mere absence of illness), we propose an alternative view according to which mental integrity can be characterised both as a positive right to (medical and non-medical) interventions that restore and sustain mental and neural function, and promote its development and a negative right protecting people from interventions that threaten or undermine these functions or their development. We will argue that this notion is dissociated from cognitive control and therefore can be adequately distinguished from autonomy. 
700 1 |a Aboitiz, Francisco  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Álamos, Florencia  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Vergara, Paulina Ramos  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 50(2024), 10, Seite 664-669  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:50  |g year:2024  |g number:10  |g pages:664-669 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109682  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/50/10/664  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4675115535 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1918788316 
LOK |0 005 20250228113750 
LOK |0 008 250228||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw