Gain-of-function research and model organisms in biology

So-called ‘gain-of-function’ (GOF) research is virological research that results in a virus substantially more virulent or transmissible than its wild antecedent. GOF research has been subject to ethical analysis in the past, but the methods of GOF research have to date been underexamined by philoso...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Evans, Nicholas G. (Author) ; Pence, Charles H. ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2024, Volume: 50, Issue: 3, Pages: 201-206
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1918776091
003 DE-627
005 20250301054328.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250228s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme-2022-108853  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1918776091 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1918776091 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Evans, Nicholas G.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-3330-0224  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Gain-of-function research and model organisms in biology 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a So-called ‘gain-of-function’ (GOF) research is virological research that results in a virus substantially more virulent or transmissible than its wild antecedent. GOF research has been subject to ethical analysis in the past, but the methods of GOF research have to date been underexamined by philosophers in these analyses. Here, we examine the typical animal used in influenza GOF experiments, the ferret, and show how despite its longstanding use, it does not easily satisfy the desirable criteria for an animal model. We then discuss the limitations of the ferret model, and how those epistemic limitations bear on ethical and policy questions around the risks and benefits of GOF research. We conclude with a reflection on how philosophy of science can contribute to ethical and policy debates around the risks, benefits and relative priority of life sciences research. 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1244881066  |0 (DE-627)1775903621  |4 aut  |a Pence, Charles H.  |d ca. 20./21. Jh. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 50(2024), 3, Seite 201-206  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:50  |g year:2024  |g number:3  |g pages:201-206 
856 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/early/2023/05/15/jme-2022-108853.full.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108853  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/50/3/201  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4675089216 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1918776091 
LOK |0 005 20250228102550 
LOK |0 008 250228||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw