Egalitarianism, moral status and abortion: a reply to Miller

Calum Miller recently argued that a commitment to a very modest form of egalitarianism—equality between non-disabled human adults—implies fetal personhood. Miller claims that the most plausible basis for human equality is in being human—an attribute which fetuses have—therefore, abortion is likely t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Räsänen, Joona (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado: 2023
En: Journal of medical ethics
Año: 2023, Volumen: 49, Número: 10, Páginas: 717-718
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1918678146
003 DE-627
005 20250227083925.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250227s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme-2022-108821  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1918678146 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1918678146 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Räsänen, Joona  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-7383-6138  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Egalitarianism, moral status and abortion: a reply to Miller 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Calum Miller recently argued that a commitment to a very modest form of egalitarianism—equality between non-disabled human adults—implies fetal personhood. Miller claims that the most plausible basis for human equality is in being human—an attribute which fetuses have—therefore, abortion is likely to be morally wrong. In this paper, I offer a plausible defence for the view that equality between non-disabled human adults does not imply fetal personhood. I also offer a challenge for Miller’s view. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 49(2023), 10, Seite 717-718  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:49  |g year:2023  |g number:10  |g pages:717-718 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/RSNEMS-5.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h null [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108821  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/49/10/717  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4673912977 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1918678146 
LOK |0 005 20250227083925 
LOK |0 008 250227||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw