Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are quickly gaining ground in healthcare and clinical decision-making. However, it is still unclear in what way AI can or should support decision-making that is based on incapacitated patients’ values and goals of care, which often requires input from clinicians...
| Главные авторы: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
2023
|
| В: |
Journal of medical ethics
Год: 2023, Том: 49, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 165-174 |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 191866093X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250227050342.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/jme-2022-108371 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)191866093X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP191866093X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1340205874 |0 (DE-627)1899521771 |4 aut |a Ferrario, Andrea |d 1981- | |
| 109 | |a Ferrario, Andrea 1981- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are quickly gaining ground in healthcare and clinical decision-making. However, it is still unclear in what way AI can or should support decision-making that is based on incapacitated patients’ values and goals of care, which often requires input from clinicians and loved ones. Although the use of algorithms to predict patients’ most likely preferred treatment has been discussed in the medical ethics literature, no example has been realised in clinical practice. This is due, arguably, to the lack of a structured approach to the epistemological, ethical and pragmatic challenges arising from the design and use of such algorithms. The present paper offers a new perspective on the problem by suggesting that preference predicting AIs be viewed as sociotechnical systems with distinctive life-cycles. We explore how both known and novel challenges map onto the different stages of development, highlighting interdisciplinary strategies for their resolution. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Gloeckler, Sophie |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0002-7658-823X |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Biller-Andorno, Nikola |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0001-7661-1324 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 49(2023), 3, Seite 165-174 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:49 |g year:2023 |g number:3 |g pages:165-174 |
| 856 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/49/3/165.full.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [deprecated] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108371 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/49/3/165 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4673504178 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 191866093X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250226163805 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250226||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a ixrk | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
