Neurofeedback as placebo: a case of unintentional deception?

The use of placebo in clinical practice has been the topic of extensive debate in the bioethics literature, with much scholarship focusing on concerns regarding deception. While considerations of placebo without deception have largely centred on open-label placebo, this paper considers a different k...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Authors: Kalokairinou, Louiza (Author) ; Sullivan, Laura Specker (Author) ; Wexler, Anna (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado em: 2022
Em: Journal of medical ethics
Ano: 2022, Volume: 48, Número: 12, Páginas: 1037-1042
Acesso em linha: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1918656584
003 DE-627
005 20250226155734.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/medethics-2021-107435  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1918656584 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1918656584 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kalokairinou, Louiza  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-5787-6535  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Neurofeedback as placebo: a case of unintentional deception? 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The use of placebo in clinical practice has been the topic of extensive debate in the bioethics literature, with much scholarship focusing on concerns regarding deception. While considerations of placebo without deception have largely centred on open-label placebo, this paper considers a different kind of ethical quandary regarding placebo without an intent to deceive—one where the provider believes a treatment is effective due to a direct physiological mechanism, even though that belief may not be supported by rigorous scientific evidence. This is often the case with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) techniques and also with some mainstream therapies that have not proven to be better than sham. Using one such CAM technique as a case study—electroencephalography (EEG) neurofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)—this paper explores the ethics of providing therapies that may have some beneficial effect, although one that is likely due to placebo effect. First, we provide background on EEG neurofeedback for ADHD and its evidence base, showing how it has proven to be equivalent to—but not better than—sham neurofeedback. Subsequently, we explore whether offering therapies that are claimed to work via specific physical pathways, but may actually work due to the placebo effect, constitute deception. We suggest that this practice may constitute unintentional deception regarding mechanism of action. Ultimately, we argue that providers have increased information provision obligations when offering treatments that diverge from standard of care and we make recommendations for mitigating unintentional deception. 
601 |a Placebo 
700 1 |a Sullivan, Laura Specker  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wexler, Anna  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-6723-9038  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 48(2022), 12, Seite 1037-1042  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:48  |g year:2022  |g number:12  |g pages:1037-1042 
856 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/9205641  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107435  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/48/12/1037  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4673494075 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1918656584 
LOK |0 005 20250226155734 
LOK |0 008 250226||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
LOK |0 939   |a 26-02-25  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw