Public attitudes about equitable COVID-19 vaccine allocation: a randomised experiment of race-based versus novel place-based frames
Equity was—and is—central in the US policy response to COVID-19, given its disproportionate impact on disadvantaged communities of colour. In an unprecedented turn, the majority of US states used place-based disadvantage indices to promote equity in vaccine allocation (eg, through larger vaccine sha...
| Authors: | ; ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2022
|
| In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2022, Volume: 48, Issue: 12, Pages: 993-999 |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1918656509 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250226155729.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/jme-2022-108194 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1918656509 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1918656509 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Schmidt, Harald |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0003-4806-8816 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Public attitudes about equitable COVID-19 vaccine allocation: a randomised experiment of race-based versus novel place-based frames |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Equity was—and is—central in the US policy response to COVID-19, given its disproportionate impact on disadvantaged communities of colour. In an unprecedented turn, the majority of US states used place-based disadvantage indices to promote equity in vaccine allocation (eg, through larger vaccine shares for more disadvantaged areas and people of colour). We conducted a nationally representative survey experiment (n=2003) in April 2021 (before all US residents had become vaccine eligible), that examined respondents’ perceptions of the acceptability of disadvantage indices relative to two ways of prioritising racial and ethnic groups more directly, and assessed the role of framing and expert anchors in shaping perceptions. A majority of respondents supported the use of disadvantage indices, and one-fifth opposed any of the three equity-promoting plans. Differences in support and opposition were identified by respondents’ political party affiliation. Providing a numerical anchor (that indicated expert recommendations and states’ actual practices in reserving a proportion of allocations for prioritised groups) led respondents to prefer a lower distribution of reserved vaccine allocations compared with the randomised condition without this anchor, and the effect of the anchor differed across the frames. Our findings support ongoing uses of disadvantage indices in vaccine allocation, and, by extension, in allocating tests, masks or treatments, especially when supply cannot meet demand. The findings can also inform US allocation frameworks in future pandemic planning, and could provide lessons on how to promote equity in clinical and public health outside of the pandemic setting. | ||
| 601 | |a COVID-19 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Shaikh, Sonia Jawaid |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0002-3951-2025 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sadecki, Emily |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Buttenheim, Alison |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gollust, Sarah |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 48(2022), 12, Seite 993-999 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:48 |g year:2022 |g number:12 |g pages:993-999 |
| 856 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/48/12/993.full.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [deprecated] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108194 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/48/12/993 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4673493982 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1918656509 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250226155729 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250226||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a ixrk | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
