Why we should not ‘just use age’ for COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation
Older age is one of the greatest risk factors for severe outcomes from COVID-19. If we believe it is important to use limited supplies of COVID-19 vaccines to protect the most vulnerable and prevent deaths, then available doses should be allocated with significant priority to older adults. Yet, we s...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2022
|
| In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2022, Volume: 48, Issue: 8, Pages: 538-541 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1918653348 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250226153447.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/medethics-2021-107443 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1918653348 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1918653348 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Smith, Maxwell J. |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0001-5230-0548 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why we should not ‘just use age’ for COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Older age is one of the greatest risk factors for severe outcomes from COVID-19. If we believe it is important to use limited supplies of COVID-19 vaccines to protect the most vulnerable and prevent deaths, then available doses should be allocated with significant priority to older adults. Yet, we should resist the conclusion that age should be the sole criterion for COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation or that no younger populations (eg, those under the age of 60) should be prioritised until all older adults have been vaccinated. This article examines arguments that are commonly presented to abandon ‘complex’ vaccine prioritisation schemes in favour of ‘just using age’ (eg, prioritising those 80 years of age and older and then decreasing in a 5-year age bands until the entire population has had the opportunity to be vaccinated), and articulates the ethical reasons why these arguments are not persuasive. | ||
| 601 | |a COVID-19 | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 48(2022), 8, Seite 538-541 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:48 |g year:2022 |g number:8 |g pages:538-541 |
| 856 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/48/8/538.full.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [deprecated] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107443 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/48/8/538 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4673488792 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1918653348 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250226153447 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250226||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a ixrk | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
