The Canons of Antioch

The death of Constantine in AD 337 brought forth a struggle between leading bishops of the eastern and western empire which proved crucially important in the development of ecclesiastical politics. Athanasius of Alexandria was one of several controversial bishops who, having been deposed during Cons...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Stephens, C. W. B. (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2007
In: Studies in church history
Jahr: 2007, Band: 43, Seiten: 46-56
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1917868987
003 DE-627
005 20250224074244.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250224s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0424208400003090  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1917868987 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1917868987 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Stephens, C. W. B.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Canons of Antioch 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The death of Constantine in AD 337 brought forth a struggle between leading bishops of the eastern and western empire which proved crucially important in the development of ecclesiastical politics. Athanasius of Alexandria was one of several controversial bishops who, having been deposed during Constantine’s reign, were re-instated by the new emperors after the change of regime which followed his death. As with other cases, Athanasius’s restoration was fiercely contested within the Church, where many bishops felt that an imperial edict of repeal could not overrule a just and final deposition by an ecclesiastical synod. He therefore found himself quickly ejected from Alexandria by rival ecclesiastical powers. The numerous theological and polemical writings which Athanasius produced following this period became enormously influential. Historians still widely follow his version of events, seeing the struggle among bishops which his restoration sparked as centred on an ‘Arian versus orthodox’ theological battle, whereby western supporters of Athanasius fended off eastern attacks against the divinity of Christ. This approach is dangerous. Although the Alexandrian’s writings are both detailed and prolific, they can hardly be called disinterested. Throughout his histories, bishops whom he attacks most fervently as Arians are precisely those who contested his own legitimacy as a bishop. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Studies in church history  |d Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1964  |g 43(2007), Seite 46-56  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)848723376  |w (DE-600)2848379-0  |w (DE-576)456843140  |x 2059-0644  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:43  |g year:2007  |g pages:46-56 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0424208400003090  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/studies-in-church-history/article/canons-of-antioch/EA50ADDDF753CDE72A41F38AA5BBAF61  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4670004050 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1917868987 
LOK |0 005 20250224073831 
LOK |0 008 250224||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
LOK |0 939   |a 24-02-25  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw