Das Verhältnis zwischen Hieroglyphen- und Keilschrift-Luwisch: Überlegungen zu den Ursprüngen der anatolischen Hieroglyphenschrift
The linguistic differences between Hieroglyphic and Cuneiform Luwian have long been known. However, it is unclear how these should be assessed: How exactly do the two varieties relate to each other? Are they different dialects, just different registers or even different sociolects? Based on the thes...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Deutsch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2022
|
| In: |
Altorientalische Forschungen
Jahr: 2022, Band: 49, Heft: 1, Seiten: 18-31 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Anatolian hieroglyphs
B Hieroglyphic Luwian B Cuneiform Luwian B functiolect |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1916803229 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250530000911.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250210s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/aofo-2022-0002 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1916803229 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1916803229 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a ger | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1064283314 |0 (DE-627)813135397 |0 (DE-576)423881973 |4 aut |a Breyer, Francis |d 1977- | |
| 109 | |a Breyer, Francis 1977- |a Breyer, Francis Amadeus Karl 1977- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a Das Verhältnis zwischen Hieroglyphen- und Keilschrift-Luwisch: Überlegungen zu den Ursprüngen der anatolischen Hieroglyphenschrift |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The linguistic differences between Hieroglyphic and Cuneiform Luwian have long been known. However, it is unclear how these should be assessed: How exactly do the two varieties relate to each other? Are they different dialects, just different registers or even different sociolects? Based on the thesis developed recently, according to which the transformation of the Luwian hieroglyphs into a veritable writing system only took place in the context of the late Hittite empire, this article works out that Hieroglyphic Luwian probably is to be considered a functiolect. | ||
| 601 | |a Hieroglyphe | ||
| 601 | |a Ursprung | ||
| 601 | |a Hieroglyphenschrift | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Anatolian hieroglyphs | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cuneiform Luwian | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hieroglyphic Luwian | |
| 650 | 4 | |a functiolect | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Altorientalische Forschungen |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 1974 |g 49(2022), 1, Seite 18-31 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)566014262 |w (DE-600)2425759-X |w (DE-576)283407646 |x 2196-6761 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:49 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g pages:18-31 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/aofo-2022-0002 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/aofo-2022-0002/html |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4662742617 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1916803229 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250210145407 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250210||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a ixrk | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 10-02-25 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
