Das Verhältnis zwischen Hieroglyphen- und Keilschrift-Luwisch: Überlegungen zu den Ursprüngen der anatolischen Hieroglyphenschrift
The linguistic differences between Hieroglyphic and Cuneiform Luwian have long been known. However, it is unclear how these should be assessed: How exactly do the two varieties relate to each other? Are they different dialects, just different registers or even different sociolects? Based on the thes...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Tedesco |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
2022
|
| In: |
Altorientalische Forschungen
Anno: 2022, Volume: 49, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 18-31 |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Anatolian hieroglyphs
B Hieroglyphic Luwian B Cuneiform Luwian B functiolect |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Riepilogo: | The linguistic differences between Hieroglyphic and Cuneiform Luwian have long been known. However, it is unclear how these should be assessed: How exactly do the two varieties relate to each other? Are they different dialects, just different registers or even different sociolects? Based on the thesis developed recently, according to which the transformation of the Luwian hieroglyphs into a veritable writing system only took place in the context of the late Hittite empire, this article works out that Hieroglyphic Luwian probably is to be considered a functiolect. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2196-6761 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Altorientalische Forschungen
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/aofo-2022-0002 |
