On the Legal Status of Human Cerebral Organoids: Lessons from Animal Law

This paper will ask whether the legal status presently afforded to nonhuman animals ought to influence regulatory debates concerning human cerebral organoids. The New York Courts recently refused to grant a writ of habeas corpus to Happy the Elephant as she was property rather than a legal person wh...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jowitt, Joshua (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2023
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2023, Volume: 32, Issue: 4, Pages: 572-581
Further subjects:B Sentience
B animal law
B legal personhood
B human cerebral organoids
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1916598307
003 DE-627
005 20250206144939.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250206s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180122000858  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1916598307 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1916598307 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1283605600  |0 (DE-627)1839391987  |4 aut  |a Jowitt, Joshua 
109 |a Jowitt, Joshua 
245 1 0 |a On the Legal Status of Human Cerebral Organoids: Lessons from Animal Law 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper will ask whether the legal status presently afforded to nonhuman animals ought to influence regulatory debates concerning human cerebral organoids. The New York Courts recently refused to grant a writ of habeas corpus to Happy the Elephant as she was property rather than a legal person while at the same time accepting that she is a moral patient deserving of rights protection. An undesirable situation has therefore arisen in which the law holds a being with moral status to be incapable of benefitting from legal redress due to their legal status as property.The author argues that this is something that we ought to avoid when designing the regulatory framework which will govern the use of human cerebral organoids. Yet, a difference exists in that, whereas the judges already accept Happy is a moral patient, there is presently no consensus around the moral status of organoids. This paper will consider whether human cerebral organoids have passed the moral threshold of sentience. If they have, or are close to doing so, regulators ought to consider their legal status in advance so as to ensure that adequate limitations are placed on this usage so as to avoid unethical practices. 
601 |a Organoid 
650 4 |a animal law 
650 4 |a human cerebral organoids 
650 4 |a legal personhood 
650 4 |a Sentience 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 32(2023), 4, Seite 572-581  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:32  |g year:2023  |g number:4  |g pages:572-581 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180122000858  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/on-the-legal-status-of-human-cerebral-organoids-lessons-from-animal-law/9C0349ACDE8E59FA82B1F5FD5ECFF736  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4661661869 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1916598307 
LOK |0 005 20250206144434 
LOK |0 008 250206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
LOK |0 939   |a 06-02-25  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw