A Critical Analysis of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and the Consequences of Fetal Personhood
In this paper, I will examine the Supreme Court of the United States’ (SCOTUS) arguments in the majority decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, and I will show how some of those arguments are flawed. Primarily, I will show that the right to bodily autonomy is a well-established ri...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
2023
|
| En: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Año: 2023, Volumen: 32, Número: 3, Páginas: 357-367 |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Ethics
B Biomedical ethics B Abortion B Philosophy B Personhood |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1916597173 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250206143826.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250206s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0963180122000809 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1916597173 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1916597173 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1124178767 |0 (DE-627)877875766 |0 (DE-576)482377577 |4 aut |a Manninen, Bertha Alvarez |d 1977- | |
| 109 | |a Manninen, Bertha Alvarez 1977- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Critical Analysis of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and the Consequences of Fetal Personhood |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper, I will examine the Supreme Court of the United States’ (SCOTUS) arguments in the majority decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, and I will show how some of those arguments are flawed. Primarily, I will show that the right to bodily autonomy is a well-established right, both in the courts and in societal practices, and that the right to an abortion should be understood as an example of the right to bodily autonomy or bodily integrity. Second, I will examine the justices’ arguments that viability is not a reasonable place to restrict abortion access, in contrast to both Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, and will offer arguments that defend viability as a valid point to limit abortion access. Third, I will highlight some politicians’ goals to enact a federal ban on abortion, and show how the attempt to pass Personhood Amendments is a pathway for doing so. The upshot of this essay to is show how the SCOTUS decision is flawed, and how granting personhood to "potential life" has consequences that extend beyond abortion access. | ||
| 601 | |a Jackson, Mo. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Abortion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biomedical ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Personhood | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992 |g 32(2023), 3, Seite 357-367 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306655039 |w (DE-600)1499985-7 |w (DE-576)081985010 |x 1469-2147 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2023 |g number:3 |g pages:357-367 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180122000809 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/critical-analysis-of-dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organization-and-the-consequences-of-fetal-personhood/A8803B46F4A0C9157C639289F463A83C |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4661659236 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1916597173 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250206143451 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a ixrk | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a The Ethics |
