Healthcare Priorities: The "Young" and the "Old"

Some philosophers and segments of the public think age is relevant to healthcare priority-setting. One argument for this is based in equity: "Old" patients have had either more of a relevant good than "young" patients or enough of that good and so have weaker claims to treatment....

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Davies, Ben (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
出版: 2023
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2023, 卷: 32, 發布: 2, Pages: 174-185
Further subjects:B Ageism
B priority-setting
B fair innings
在線閱讀: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
實物特徵
總結:Some philosophers and segments of the public think age is relevant to healthcare priority-setting. One argument for this is based in equity: "Old" patients have had either more of a relevant good than "young" patients or enough of that good and so have weaker claims to treatment. This article first notes that some discussions of age-based priority that focus in this way on old and young patients exhibit an ambiguity between two claims: that patients classified as old should have a low priority, and that patients classified as young should have high priority. The author next argues, drawing on a problem raised by Christine Overall, that equity cannot justify giving "old" patients low priority, since there is wide variety in the total lifetime experiences of older people, partly influenced by gender, race, class, and disability injustice. Finally, the author suggests that there might be a limited role for age-based prioritization in the context of infant and childhood death, since those who die in childhood are always and uncontroversially among the worst-off.
ISSN:1469-2147
Contains:Enthalten in: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0963180122000299