Misreading Tertullian and Other Remarks on 1 Cor 14:34-35: A Response to Joseph Wilson
This note is a short response to the article published by Joseph Wilson entitled “Recasting Paul as a Chauvinist within the Western Text-Type Manuscript Tradition: Implications for the Authorship Debate on 1 Corinthians 14.34–35.” In his article, Wilson aims to strengthen the arguments used by advoc...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
2024
|
| Στο/Στη: |
TC
Έτος: 2024, Τόμος: 29, Σελίδες: 161-172 |
| Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Bibel. Korintherbrief 1. 14
B Tertullianus, Quintus Septimius Florens 150-230 |
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | HC Καινή Διαθήκη |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Bibel Korintherbrief 1,14:34-35
|
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Σύνοψη: | This note is a short response to the article published by Joseph Wilson entitled “Recasting Paul as a Chauvinist within the Western Text-Type Manuscript Tradition: Implications for the Authorship Debate on 1 Corinthians 14.34–35.” In his article, Wilson aims to strengthen the arguments used by advocates of the so-called Corinthian slogan theory or the quotation/refutation (abbreviated Q/R) hypothesis, which considers 1 Cor 14:34–35 to be a Corinthian slogan that Paul refutes by two strong questions contained in verse 36. In addition to restating a special reading of verse 36 due to the two disjunctive particles ἤ that introduce the questions of verse 36, Wilson intensifies the Q/R hypothesis by reading 1 Cor 14:34–35 in light of Tertullian’s Against Marcion. Wilson suspects that it was Tertullian who introduced a chauvinistic reading of 1 Cor 14:34–36. Here I argue that Wilson misreads Tertullian, and I demonstrate that the interpretation of the syntactical function of the disjunctive particles as argued by the defenders of the Q/R hypothesis is untenable. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1089-7747 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: TC
|
