Review of Testimony by the Respondent and Civil Attorney: Canon 1598
A Respondent has asked to review the testimony and acts of the case concerning her former marriage. Up to this point she had neither responded nor cooperated in any manner whatsoever. She wants the material mailed to her at home. When told that this could not be done, that she would have to appear a...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Druck Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2006
|
| In: |
CLSA advisory opinions, 2001-2005
Jahr: 2001, Seiten: 416-419 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Katholische Kirche, Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 1598
|
| IxTheo Notationen: | SA Kirchenrecht; Staatskirchenrecht SB Katholisches Kirchenrecht |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1911763105 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20251218134610.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 241210s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 020 | |a 9781932208115 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1911763105 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1911763105 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ritty, J. Michael |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Review of Testimony by the Respondent and Civil Attorney |b Canon 1598 |c J. Michael Ritty, J.C.L. |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A Respondent has asked to review the testimony and acts of the case concerning her former marriage. Up to this point she had neither responded nor cooperated in any manner whatsoever. She wants the material mailed to her at home. When told that this could not be done, that she would have to appear at the tribunal for such a review, her civil attorney responded, saying he would review the material on her behalf. The tribunal informed the attorney that this could not be allowed, that only the respondent herself and her ecclesiastical advocate could review the material. The respondent is upset by this information. She may appeal an affirmative judgment, should one be forthcoming. Would this denial of permission of the civil attorney, who is not a canon lawyer, be seen as a denial of the respondent's right of defense? | ||
| 652 | |a SA:SB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4797269-5 |0 (DE-627)70280830X |0 (DE-576)216431913 |a Katholische Kirche |2 gnd |4 aut1 |w r |i Verfasserschaft1 |e Verfasserschaft1 |t Codex iuris canonici |f 1983 |p 1598 |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t CLSA advisory opinions, 2001-2005 |d Alexandria, VA : Canon Law Society of America, 2006 |g (2001/2005), Seite 416-419 |h xxx, 636 p |w (DE-627)1700137174 |z 1932208119 |z 9781932208115 |7 nnam |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2001/2005 |g pages:416-419 |
| 935 | |a DAKR | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| CAL | |a 215980000_215989999 | ||
| CAN | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4634263181 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1911763105 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250108135456 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 241210||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-3 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-3 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-3 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053313 |a SB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053283 |a SA | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 10-12-24 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SUB | |a CAN | ||
