Dismissal of an Advocate/Procurator: Canon 1486
The advocate/procurator was dismissed by the petitioner, who wrote a letter to the first instance judicial vicar revoking the mandate of appointment for the advocate/procurator he had appointed because he felt that the advocate/procurator did not give appropriate pastoral consideration to his situat...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Druck Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2006
|
| In: |
CLSA advisory opinions, 2001-2005
Jahr: 2001, Seiten: 388-391 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Katholische Kirche, Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 1486
|
| IxTheo Notationen: | SA Kirchenrecht; Staatskirchenrecht SB Katholisches Kirchenrecht |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1911753487 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20251218134747.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 241210s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 020 | |a 9781932208115 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1911753487 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1911753487 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)143872893 |0 (DE-627)70462737X |0 (DE-576)172341868 |4 aut |a Mendonça, Augustine |d 1941- | |
| 109 | |a Mendonça, Augustine 1941- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dismissal of an Advocate/Procurator |b Canon 1486 |c Augustine Mendonca, J.C.D. |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The advocate/procurator was dismissed by the petitioner, who wrote a letter to the first instance judicial vicar revoking the mandate of appointment for the advocate/procurator he had appointed because he felt that the advocate/procurator did not give appropriate pastoral consideration to his situation. The advocate/procurator was appointed for both instances. The petitioner gave a new mandate to another advocate/procurator who accepted it and signed it. Copies of this new mandate were sent to the appeal tribunal and to the first advocate/procurator. Is this action of removal of an advocate/procurator by the petitioner legitimate? What is the role of the judge in this type of a situation? | ||
| 652 | |a SA:SB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)1213460409 |0 (DE-627)1722519193 |0 (DE-576)191644501 |a Katholische Kirche |2 gnd |4 aut1 |w r |i Verfasserschaft1 |e Verfasserschaft1 |t Codex iuris canonici |f 1983 |p 1486 |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t CLSA advisory opinions, 2001-2005 |d Alexandria, VA : Canon Law Society of America, 2006 |g (2001/2005), Seite 388-391 |h xxx, 636 p |w (DE-627)1700137174 |z 1932208119 |z 9781932208115 |7 nnam |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2001/2005 |g pages:388-391 |
| 935 | |a DAKR | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| CAL | |a 214860000_214869999 | ||
| CAN | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4634220288 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1911753487 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250108133612 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 241210||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-3 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-3 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-3 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053313 |a SB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053283 |a SA | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 10-12-24 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SUB | |a CAN | ||
