Genesis 2–3 as a Primal Scene for Weak Metaphysics
In this paper, I examine the role that the biblical story of Adam and Eve, Genesis 2–3, plays for philosophers and biblical scholars who advocate a weak metaphysics. In particular, I discuss writings by Mark Glouberman, Richard Kearney and Gianni Vattimo. I examine the question of whether and in wha...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| In: |
Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society
Jahr: 2024, Band: 10, Heft: 2, Seiten: 387-403 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
God who may be
B Adam and Eve B ontology of the particular B weak metaphysics B jezer B weak thinking |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Zusammenfassung: | In this paper, I examine the role that the biblical story of Adam and Eve, Genesis 2–3, plays for philosophers and biblical scholars who advocate a weak metaphysics. In particular, I discuss writings by Mark Glouberman, Richard Kearney and Gianni Vattimo. I examine the question of whether and in what sense Genesis 2–3 can be said to be a primal scene for weak thinking or weak metaphysics. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2364-2807 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.30965/23642807-bja10107 |
