The Philosophy and History of the Moral ‘Ought’: Some of Anscombe’s Objections

According to G.E.M Anscombe’s paper ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, modern moral philosophy has introduced a spurious concept of moral obligation, and has therefore made a mistake that the Greeks, and Aristotle in particular, avoided. Anscombe argues that the modern concepts of obligation, duty, and the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Irwin, Terence 1947- (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2024
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Jahr: 2024, Band: 27, Heft: 5, Seiten: 667-680
IxTheo Notationen:NCA Ethik
TA Geschichte
VA Philosophie
weitere Schlagwörter:B Anscombe
B Ought
B Law
B Morality
B Obligation
B Non-cognitivism
B Hume
B Aristotle
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1910012947
003 DE-627
005 20250402101138.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 241202s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-023-10398-w  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1910012947 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1910012947 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)138707820  |0 (DE-627)605262993  |0 (DE-576)308768175  |4 aut  |a Irwin, Terence  |d 1947- 
109 |a Irwin, Terence 1947-  |a Irwin, T. H. 1947-  |a Irwin, Terence H. 1947-  |a Irwin, Terence Henry 1947- 
245 1 4 |a The Philosophy and History of the Moral ‘Ought’: Some of Anscombe’s Objections 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to G.E.M Anscombe’s paper ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, modern moral philosophy has introduced a spurious concept of moral obligation, and has therefore made a mistake that the Greeks, and Aristotle in particular, avoided. Anscombe argues that the modern concepts of obligation, duty, and the moral ‘ought’ are the remnants of an earlier, but post-Aristotelian conception of ethics, and that they ought to be abandoned. An examination of Anscombe’s historical and philosophical claims shows that we have no reason to take them seriously. In particular, they rest on a misinterpretation of Scholastic views on ‘ought’ and obligation. 
601 |a Philosophie 
601 |a Historie 
601 |a Anscombe, G. E. M. 
650 4 |a Anscombe 
650 4 |a Aristotle 
650 4 |a Hume 
650 4 |a Law 
650 4 |a Morality 
650 4 |a Non-cognitivism 
650 4 |a Obligation 
650 4 |a Ought 
652 |a NCA:TA:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 27(2024), 5, Seite 667-680  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2024  |g number:5  |g pages:667-680 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-023-10398-w.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-023-10398-w  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4629481796 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1910012947 
LOK |0 005 20250402101138 
LOK |0 008 241202||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053402  |a TA 
LOK |0 939   |a 02-12-24  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL