‘Who Can Forgive Sins but God Alone?’ Third-Party Forgiveness and Christian Practice

In recent years, third-party forgiveness has received renewed attention, much of it negative. While a few have undertaken important attempts to defend or expound accounts of third-party forgiveness, many suspect that it is incoherent, vicious, or both. If true, this would be bad news for Christians,...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Peterson, Andrew J. (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Έκδοση: 2024
Στο/Στη: Studies in Christian ethics
Έτος: 2024, Τόμος: 37, Τεύχος: 4, Σελίδες: 844-866
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo:NBE Ανθρωπολογία
ΝΒΚ Σωτηριολογία
NCA Ηθική 
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά:B Justice
B Forgiveness
B Atonement
B Reconciliation
B forgiving for another
B God's forgiveness
B third party
Διαθέσιμο Online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Περιγραφή
Σύνοψη:In recent years, third-party forgiveness has received renewed attention, much of it negative. While a few have undertaken important attempts to defend or expound accounts of third-party forgiveness, many suspect that it is incoherent, vicious, or both. If true, this would be bad news for Christians, for Christians rely on notions of third-party forgiveness for their accounts of salvation and pastoral authority. I think there is reason to think that some notions of third-party forgiveness can overcome the critics’ worries. In what follows, I argue that third-party forgiveness is more common, coherent, salutary, and diverse in species than many critics suppose. After considering key objections to third-party forgiveness, I offer a constructive account of it that makes sense of these objections while also defending the underlying concept and act. What emerges from this defense is a newfound appreciation for the diverse species of third-party forgiveness. Still, some of these species are more intelligible and safeguarded from declension than others, and I conclude by examining the limits of third-party forgiveness by considering its most contentious species.
ISSN:0953-9468
Περιλαμβάνει:Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/09539468241285757