The Aramaic Uzziah Inscription and the Syntax of an Ancient Forgery
Upon scrutiny, the accepted historical contextualization of the famous Uzziah Epitaph (IM 65.56.38 = CIIP 602) is revealed to be full of difficulties. While Garbini’s argument that the artefact is a modern fake is unconvincing, good reasons exist to explore it instead as an ancient forgery. The pres...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman period
Jahr: 2024, Band: 55, Heft: 4/5, Seiten: 518-549 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Tombs
B Tourism B Uzziah inscription B fakes B staged authenticity B Pausanias |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Upon scrutiny, the accepted historical contextualization of the famous Uzziah Epitaph (IM 65.56.38 = CIIP 602) is revealed to be full of difficulties. While Garbini’s argument that the artefact is a modern fake is unconvincing, good reasons exist to explore it instead as an ancient forgery. The present article accordingly explores an alternative understanding of the inscription as the product of a hellenized fashion for the sight-seeing of celebrity tombs and an emergent culture of “biblical tourism” in Judea. From this perspective the “staged authenticity” of the epitaph is analyzed through the socio-rhetorical function of the object as understood and experienced within this context. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0631 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman period
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700631-bja10092 |
