A Response to Three Discussions of My Professional Work and Thought
I do not have any significant criticisms of the papers in this issue by Samantha Noll, Shane Epting, and Shan Gao. However, as a response, I can provide some discussion of how my views came to be and what remains unfinished near the end of my career.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2024
|
| In: |
Environmental ethics
Year: 2024, Volume: 46, Issue: 3, Pages: 255-266 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | I do not have any significant criticisms of the papers in this issue by Samantha Noll, Shane Epting, and Shan Gao. However, as a response, I can provide some discussion of how my views came to be and what remains unfinished near the end of my career. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2153-7895 |
| Reference: | Kritik zu "Weak Anthropocentrism's Future (2024)"
Kritik zu "Hargrove's Ontological Argument for the Aesthetic Foundation of Wilderness Preservation (2024)" Kritik zu "Environmental Ethics Down on the Farm (2024)" Kritik in "Weak Anthropocentrism's Future (2024)" Kritik in "Environmental Ethics Down on the Farm (2024)" Kritik in "Hargrove's Ontological Argument for the Aesthetic Foundation of Wilderness Preservation (2024)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Environmental ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/enviroethics202491281 |
