Environmental Ethics Down on the Farm: Hargrove's Weak Anthropocentrism and the "Agricultural Blindspot"

Eugene Hargrove's impact on the field of environmental philosophy is hard to adequately convey. His service as an activist, educator, and the founder of the journal Environmental Ethics created the context in which the field thrived. His legacy also provides a strong foundation for environmenta...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Noll, Samantha (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Review
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2024
In: Environmental ethics
Anno: 2024, Volume: 46, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 247-254
Recensione di:Foundations of Environmental Ethics (Upper Saddle River : Prentice Hall, 1989) (Noll, Samantha)
Altre parole chiave:B Recensione
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:Eugene Hargrove's impact on the field of environmental philosophy is hard to adequately convey. His service as an activist, educator, and the founder of the journal Environmental Ethics created the context in which the field thrived. His legacy also provides a strong foundation for environmental ethics and activism of the future. Today, environmental philosophy is expanding to include human-dominated environments, once thought to fall outside of the purview of the discipline. Work in these "blind spots" is imperative if we wish to improve sustainability and stem the ecological bleeding that marks the Anthropocene. Hargrove’s theoretical work on "weak anthropocentric intrinsic value" opens a space for environmental ethics to better understand human-dominated environments. If Paul B. Thompson is right that the way we farm should be of utmost concern for environmentalists, then Hargrove's insights could help protect large swaths of land beyond parkland borders.
ISSN:2153-7895
Riferimento:Kritik zu "A Response to Three Discussions of My Professional Work and Thought (2024)"
Kritik in "A Response to Three Discussions of My Professional Work and Thought (2024)"
Comprende:Enthalten in: Environmental ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/enviroethics202491280