On Karl Barth and Asians: Actualism and Contextual Theologies

In this essay, I argue that Karl Barth (1886-1968) is a contextual theologian who can be an interlocutor in contextualization and decoloniality in Asia. While Barth is seen as antithetical to natural theology, which may imply opposition to contextual theologies, his theology is nevertheless contextu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Samdao, Francis Jr. S. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Asia journal of theology
Year: 2024, Volume: 38, Issue: 2, Pages: 170-190
Further subjects:B Actualism
B Karl Barth
B contextual theologies
B Contextualization
B Decolonization
B Asians
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:In this essay, I argue that Karl Barth (1886-1968) is a contextual theologian who can be an interlocutor in contextualization and decoloniality in Asia. While Barth is seen as antithetical to natural theology, which may imply opposition to contextual theologies, his theology is nevertheless contextual since he was fully engaged with the mood of his time while proclaiming that God turned his face toward humanity. In this article, I will draw on his concept of actualism found in his Church Dogmatics II. I contend that actualism calls us to 1) go beyond the translation approach, 2) respond to God’s revelation through contextualization and decolonization, and 3) consider God as the main subject and object in our contextual and decolonial endeavors in Asia.
ISSN:2815-1828
Contains:Enthalten in: Asia journal of theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.54424/ajt.v38i2.112