Classical Theism, Interpersonal Relations, and the Receptivity of God
A central tenet of classical theism is that God is Pure Act, and thus many classical theists reject the notion that there is any receptivity in God. This is to say, while God can act on creatures, he cannot be acted on by those creatures. While such a view is commonplace for classical theists, in th...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
2024
|
| Em: |
Religions
Ano: 2024, Volume: 15, Número: 10 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Pure Act
B divine receptivity B Classical Theism B Interpersonal Relationship |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1905834004 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250109090036.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 241016s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel15101253 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1905834004 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1905834004 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1192717406 |0 (DE-627)1671222725 |4 aut |a Kintz, James | |
| 109 | |a Kintz, James |a Kintz, James S. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Classical Theism, Interpersonal Relations, and the Receptivity of God |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A central tenet of classical theism is that God is Pure Act, and thus many classical theists reject the notion that there is any receptivity in God. This is to say, while God can act on creatures, he cannot be acted on by those creatures. While such a view is commonplace for classical theists, in this project, I challenge the claim that there is no receptivity in God by drawing on a Thomistic philosophical anthropology. Highlighting the intrinsically reciprocal second-person relation, I note that persons must be both active and receptive in this bidirectional relation. Insofar as God is a person who enters into second-person relationships with his creatures, it follows that there must be receptivity in God. Nevertheless, I suggest that this receptivity is, in fact, a feature of God’s Pure Activity, and thus, it ultimately poses no serious problem for classical theism. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a divine receptivity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Interpersonal Relationship | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pure Act | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Classical Theism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 15(2024), 10, Artikel-ID 1253 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2024 |g number:10 |g elocationid:1253 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101253 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/10/1253 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4596127212 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1905834004 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20241016055505 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 241016||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-10-15#E1E69CE5DF8E37124AC4EA0818220C37A43DA8C2 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
