Rhétorique antijudaïque et triangulations polémiques au IIe siècle: le cas de Méliton et d'Ignace
This paper discusses “polemical triangulation,” a common rhetorical and polemical device in Antiquity, through which an author attacks a person or a group of persons who are not the explicit addressees of a text or speech. It looks at its use and diversity with examples from Melito of Sardis and Ign...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Print Artigo |
| Idioma: | Francês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
2022
|
| Em: |
Henoch
Ano: 2022, Volume: 44, Número: 2, Páginas: 252-270 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Melito, Sardianus -190
/ Ignatius, Antiochenus -110
/ Polêmica
/ Triangulação geodésica
/ Retórica
/ Judaísmo
/ Docetismo
/ Antijudaísmo
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | BH Judaísmo HC Novo Testamento |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Relation between Jews and Christians
B Rhetorical model B Docetism B Second century B Ignatius of Antioch B History of Christian literature B Judaism B Rhetorical assimilation B Polemics B Melito of Sardis B Pragmatics |
| Parallel Edition: | Recurso Electrónico
|
| Resumo: | This paper discusses “polemical triangulation,” a common rhetorical and polemical device in Antiquity, through which an author attacks a person or a group of persons who are not the explicit addressees of a text or speech. It looks at its use and diversity with examples from Melito of Sardis and Ignatius, in the context of polemics against the Jews and the Docetists. In all cases, these models imply the existence of a marked anti-Judaism in Ignatius and his addressees. Some well-known methodological questions are addressed, such as the author’s knowledge of the persons attacked, his or her relations with them, and other more or less consciously used sources of information. Finally, the paper draws conclusions about the relevance of the concerned statements for a historical study of the adversaries, their thinking or the arguments attributed to them. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0393-6805 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Henoch
|