Reply to Hsiao

Barrigar addresses more directly the distinction between Hsiao’s individualist-level priority on self-protection and the author’s priority on the well-being (security) of society as a whole (and thereby of the individuals within society). The author argues that our starting point as Christians is no...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Barrigar, Chris (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado em: 2024
Em: The Evangelical quarterly
Ano: 2024, Volume: 95, Número: 3, Páginas: 262-271
Outras palavras-chave:B Hsiao
B Shalom
B Individualism
B open carry
B Gun control
B Luke 22
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1904838707
003 DE-627
005 20250109085954.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 241005s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/27725472-09503010  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1904838707 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1904838707 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Barrigar, Chris  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-8955-1196  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Reply to Hsiao 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Barrigar addresses more directly the distinction between Hsiao’s individualist-level priority on self-protection and the author’s priority on the well-being (security) of society as a whole (and thereby of the individuals within society). The author argues that our starting point as Christians is not natural law and individual rights but rather God’s vision of shalom for societies. (On top of which the author argues that Hsiao’s natural law claims are disputable anyway). The author also addresses more substantially the issue of collateral harms to society within high gun-culture, a significant type of cost to society that is inadequately recognised in the literature. The author concludes by returning to his central argument, namely, that a central component of any theology of guns must include an account of agape-love, of self-sacrifice for the benefit of others, which Hsiao’s response insufficiently addresses. 
650 4 |a open carry 
650 4 |a Shalom 
650 4 |a Individualism 
650 4 |a Hsiao 
650 4 |a Gun control 
650 4 |a Luke 22 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Evangelical quarterly  |d Leiden : Brill, 1929  |g 95(2024), 3, Seite 262-271  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)357865650  |w (DE-600)2095318-5  |w (DE-576)273873946  |x 2772-5472  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:95  |g year:2024  |g number:3  |g pages:262-271 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/27725472-09503010  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/abstract/journals/evqu/95/3/article-p262_5.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4587458279 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1904838707 
LOK |0 005 20241005055507 
LOK |0 008 241005||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-10-04#0134E70816691D9C75DB438CF24582F347FF3A65 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 05-10-24  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw