Disagreement, Skepticism, and Begging the Question

In this paper, I examine Thomas Kelly’s account of the epistemic significance of bias presented in Bias: A Philosophical Study. Kelly draws a parallel between the skeptical threat from bias and the skeptical threat from disagreement, and crafts a response to these skeptical threats. According to Kel...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matheson, Jonathan 1977- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2024, Volume: 14, Issue: 3, Pages: 201-217
Further subjects:B circularity
B question-begging
B Disagreement
B Skepticism
B Test bias
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1903339650
003 DE-627
005 20250109085843.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240924s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22105700-bja10077  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1903339650 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1903339650 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1059406578  |0 (DE-627)798382368  |0 (DE-576)409153001  |4 aut  |a Matheson, Jonathan  |d 1977- 
109 |a Matheson, Jonathan 1977-  |a Matheson, Jon 1977- 
245 1 0 |a Disagreement, Skepticism, and Begging the Question 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this paper, I examine Thomas Kelly’s account of the epistemic significance of bias presented in Bias: A Philosophical Study. Kelly draws a parallel between the skeptical threat from bias and the skeptical threat from disagreement, and crafts a response to these skeptical threats. According to Kelly, someone who is not biased can rely on that fact to conclude that their disagreeing interlocutor is biased. Kelly motivates this response by drawing several parallels to recent lessons in epistemology: that some question-begging reasoning is permissible, and that there are important asymmetries between epistemological good cases and bad cases. I argue that there are several reasons to resist Kelly’s response. In brief, there are problems with each of the motivations Kelly gives for his picture. Each parallel faces significant obstacles. In addition, his response also fails to take the new evil demon intuition seriously. 
650 4 |a Skepticism 
650 4 |a circularity 
650 4 |a question-begging 
650 4 |a Disagreement 
650 4 |a Bias 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for the study of skepticism  |d Leiden : Brill, 2011  |g 14(2024), 3, Seite 201-217  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)660812843  |w (DE-600)2610085-X  |w (DE-576)345005341  |x 2210-5700  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2024  |g number:3  |g pages:201-217 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-bja10077  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/skep/14/3/article-p201_003.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4582730817 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1903339650 
LOK |0 005 20241125141919 
LOK |0 008 240924||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-09-23#37D009F022A6E15ECEB098BE3053F9C5735D8FAC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Test bias 
STB 0 0 |a Biais (distorsion) 
STC 0 0 |a Sesgo 
STG 0 0 |a Viés 
STH 0 0 |a Предвзятость 
STI 0 0 |a Μεροληψία 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Verzerrung