Φύσις as natura in St. Thomas Aquinas's Commentary on the Politics and in STh I-II, Question 94

In this paper I consider how St. Thomas dealt with φύσις as natura in his comments on the opening pages of Aristotle's Politics as translated by Moerbeke, drawing support from the commentaries on Physics II.1, Metaphysics V.4, and Nicomachean Ethics V.7, as well as from the Digest, whose langua...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:Physis as natura in St. Thomas Aquinas's Commentary on the Politics and in STh I-II, Question 94
Main Author: Mulhern, J. J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Thomist Press 2024
In: The Thomist
Year: 2024, Volume: 88, Issue: 4, Pages: 599-626
IxTheo Classification:KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages
TB Antiquity
VA Philosophy
XA Law
Further subjects:B Moerbeke
B Nature
B Natura
B Digest
B Roman Law
B Φύσις
B generatio
B Generations
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:In this paper I consider how St. Thomas dealt with φύσις as natura in his comments on the opening pages of Aristotle's Politics as translated by Moerbeke, drawing support from the commentaries on Physics II.1, Metaphysics V.4, and Nicomachean Ethics V.7, as well as from the Digest, whose language had become fashionable across the universities by the time the translations were written. Saint Thomas's understanding of these pages of the Politics may have affected his argument in the Summa, especially STh I-II, q. 94, where he shows caution in addressing the Roman law treatment of natura, and STh II-II, q. 57. Attention to St. Thomas’s language in the commentaries and the Summa may bring additional clarity to his understanding of natura and its cognates in both settings.
ISSN:2473-3725
Contains:Enthalten in: The Thomist
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1353/tho.2024.a937598