The Theory of Being and the Argument for Forms in Plato’s Sophist

This paper argues for two claims. First, that in the Sophist a metaphysical theory of being is constructed from the ground up, largely on the basis of a claim treated as an axiomatic principle, the ‘dunamis proposal’ (247d–e), which, I will argue, ought to be understood as Plato’s own definition of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leigh, Fiona (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Phronesis
Year: 2024, Volume: 69, Issue: 4, Pages: 402-438
Further subjects:B Forms
B Theory
B Sophist
B Power
B Dialectic
B Being
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1902968344
003 DE-627
005 20250109085832.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240919s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15685284-bja10096  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1902968344 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1902968344 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Leigh, Fiona  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Theory of Being and the Argument for Forms in Plato’s Sophist 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper argues for two claims. First, that in the Sophist a metaphysical theory of being is constructed from the ground up, largely on the basis of a claim treated as an axiomatic principle, the ‘dunamis proposal’ (247d–e), which, I will argue, ought to be understood as Plato’s own definition of being. Second, once its core is in place, the theory is put to use to provide dialectical arguments against proponents of alternative metaphysical theories for the existence of various entities in the ontology. These include—notably—an argument for the existence of Forms. 
601 |a Argumentation 
601 |a Sophistik 
650 4 |a Power 
650 4 |a Dialectic 
650 4 |a Theory 
650 4 |a Forms 
650 4 |a Being 
650 4 |a Sophist 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Phronesis  |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1955  |g 69(2024), 4, Seite 402-438  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)325566992  |w (DE-600)2036943-8  |w (DE-576)09411398X  |x 1568-5284  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:69  |g year:2024  |g number:4  |g pages:402-438 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-bja10096  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/phro/69/4/article-p402_2.xml  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4581585902 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1902968344 
LOK |0 005 20240919055505 
LOK |0 008 240919||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-09-18#AC2DD833901C436D63D3CBE48A5EF69A761EB69E 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 19-09-24  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL