Mimetic posthumanism: homo mimeticus 2.0 in art, philosophy and technics

"What is the relation between mimesis and posthumanism? And why should these seemingly antagonistic concepts be joined in a volume opening up a new branch of posthuman studies titled Mimetic Posthumanism? After the plurality of innovative qualifications that, since the twilight of the twentieth...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Contributors: Lawtoo, Nidesh 1976- (Editor)
Format: Print Book
Language:English
Subito Delivery Service: Order now.
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
WorldCat: WorldCat
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: Leiden Boston Brill [2025]
In: Critical posthumanisms (volume 5)
Year: 2025
Series/Journal:Critical posthumanisms volume 5
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Immitation / The Creative / Creative ability
Further subjects:B Collection of essays
B Imitation Philosophy
B Imitation
B Creative ability
Online Access: Table of Contents
Parallel Edition:Electronic
Electronic
Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 c 4500
001 1902779088
003 DE-627
005 20251226121836.0
007 tu
008 240917s2025 ne ||||| 00| ||eng c
010 |a  2024031537 
020 |a 9789004520561  |c hardback  |9 978-90-04-52056-1 
035 |a (DE-627)1902779088 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1902779088 
035 |a (OCoLC)1476532569 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
044 |c XA-NL 
050 0 |a BF357 
082 0 |a 153.1/523  |q DLC  |2 23/eng/20240911 
084 |a KUNST  |q DE-14  |2 fid 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
084 |a LH 61040  |q DE-14/sred  |2 rvk  |0 (DE-625)rvk/94202: 
245 0 0 |a Mimetic posthumanism  |b homo mimeticus 2.0 in art, philosophy and technics  |c edited by Nidesh Lawtoo 
263 |a 2410 
264 1 |a Leiden  |a Boston  |b Brill  |c [2025] 
300 |a XII, 350 Seiten  |b Illustrationen 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Critical posthumanisms  |v volume 5 
500 |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
520 |a "What is the relation between mimesis and posthumanism? And why should these seemingly antagonistic concepts be joined in a volume opening up a new branch of posthuman studies titled Mimetic Posthumanism? After the plurality of innovative qualifications that, since the twilight of the twentieth century, have been giving critical and creative specificity to the posthuman turn, rendering posthumanism "critical" and "speculative," "philosophical" and "ecological," among other future-oriented perspectives, adding "mimetic" to the list of qualifications may initially sound disappointing. Skeptics might wonder: What now? Is the posthuman turn so deprived of originality that it now returns to the old humanistic notion of "mimesis," traditionally restricted to all-too-human forms of artistic representation? This first impression is partially justified. At first sight, what we group under the rubric of mimetic posthumanism appears to look in two diametrically opposed directions: the mimetic side looks back to the past origins of aesthetic and philosophical theories attentive to the ways humans are uniquely endowed with a capacity to copy, represent and, in this restricted sense, imitate the world; the posthuman side looks ahead to technological developments that go beyond the human and are characterized by posthumanist difference rather than humanistic sameness, innovation instead of repetition, creativity and originality rather than copying or imitation. Given the long shadow mimesis casts on the very idea of technological innovation that drives posthuman studies, mimetic posthumanism might thus not only seem deprived of originality, it may also appear to generate a performative contradiction that a genealogy of philosophers informing posthuman studies has long trained us to critique, unmask, and deconstruct. And yet, precisely if we adopt genealogical lenses, the opposition between mimesis and posthumanism reveals itself to be less stable than it appears to be, generating mirroring inversions of perspective that open up new possibilities for alternative reconstructions. Convoking the ancient philosophical and aesthetic concept of "mimēsis" should at least remind thinkers of the posthuman that first appearances tend to be deceiving. A second look, in fact, shows that if the two perspectives look in opposed directions, they can be joined to compose a Janus-faced conceptual figure. As we shall see, a plurality of posthuman figurations, configurations, or, better still, transfigurations open up creative, strikingly metamorphic, and even original directions of inquiry to further a "mimetic turn or re-turn to mimesis" in the twenty-first century. After all, the same genealogists that paved the way for the supplementary "post" that now destabilizes the anthropocentric concept of the "human," rendering it "posthuman," started by troubling the hierarchical metaphysical binaries on which humanism relied. Such binaries were often structured on much-iterated oppositions such as inside/outside, nature/culture, mind/body, self/other, male/female, dominant/subaltern, and human/nonhuman. They also rested on an idealist metaphysics that opposed the "copy" to the "original," the material "phenomenon" to the ideal "Form," the "imitation" to the "model." Despite their multiple iterations that traverse the history of western thought, ultimately, such binary oppositions rested on a dominant conception of mimesis that, at least since Plato, was predicated on the mirroring logic of the Same, a vertical mimetic logic that has long been deconstructed, overturned, and unmasked as a metaphysical fiction. In the wake of Nietzsche's critique of metaphysics, humans revealed themselves to be far removed from being mere debased imitations of a divine, transcendental, and ideal model posited in an imaginary world behind the world. Rather, the very idea of a divine model, ideal, or phantom turned out to be given form by all-too-human drives constitutive of our evolutionary history in general and modernist critiques of that history in particular. As a period characterized by technological innovations and accelerations, modernist thinkers were thus quick to diagnose a change in human character or subjectivity that turned the ego into a copy, simulacrum, or, to use Nietzsche's phrase, a "phantom of the ego." Over a century later, in the wake of recent developments in robotics and algorithmic reason, and especially the artificial intelligence (AI) revolutions that increasingly blur the frontier between human and artificial intelligence, it is thus tempting to repeat modernist claims on radical changes or transformations"-- 
601 |a Philosophie 
650 0 |a Imitation  |2 DLC 
650 0 |a Imitation  |x Philosophy  |2 DLC 
650 0 |a Creative ability  |2 DLC 
655 7 |a Aufsatzsammlung  |0 (DE-588)4143413-4  |0 (DE-627)105605727  |0 (DE-576)209726091  |2 gnd-content 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4170992-5  |0 (DE-627)104269685  |0 (DE-576)209934050  |2 gnd  |a Nachahmung 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4263042-3  |0 (DE-627)104605057  |0 (DE-576)210611103  |2 gnd  |a Das Schöpferische 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4165549-7  |0 (DE-627)105439312  |0 (DE-576)20989606X  |2 gnd  |a Kreatives Denken 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
700 1 |e HerausgeberIn  |0 (DE-588)1197710450  |0 (DE-627)1679442953  |4 edt  |a Lawtoo, Nidesh  |d 1976- 
776 1 |z 9789004692053  |c ebook 
776 0 8 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Online-Ausgabe  |t Mimetic posthumanism  |d Leiden : Brill, 2025  |h 1 Online-Ressource (280 pages)  |w (DE-627)1912234378  |z 9789004692053  |k Electronic 
776 0 8 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Online-Ausgabe  |t Mimetic posthumanism  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : Brill, 2024  |h 1 Online-Ressource (362 p.)  |w (DE-627)1932563342  |z 9789004520561  |z 9789004692053  |k Electronic 
776 0 8 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Online-Ausgabe  |t Mimetic posthumanism  |d Leiden : Brill, 2024  |h 1 Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1922637130  |z 9789004692053  |k Electronic 
830 0 |a Critical posthumanisms  |v volume 5  |9 5  |w (DE-627)1679538381  |w (DE-600)2987770-2  |x 1872-0943  |7 am 
856 4 2 |u https://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz1902779088inh.htm  |m V:DE-576  |m B:DE-14  |v 20250213150506  |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis  |7 1 
935 |a GIRA 
936 r v |a LH 61040  |b Ästhetik der Bildenden Kunst und ihre Geschichte  |k Kunstgeschichte  |k Allgemeines. Allgemeine Kunstgeschichte  |k Theorie und Praxis der Bildenden Kunst  |k Theorie der Bildenden Kunst  |k Ästhetik der Bildenden Kunst und ihre Geschichte  |0 (DE-627)1270636383  |0 (DE-625)rvk/94202:  |0 (DE-576)200636383 
951 |a BO 
ACO |a 1 
ELC |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4832783394 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1902779088 
LOK |0 005 20251226121227 
LOK |0 008 251226||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-1  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852 1  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x Bibliography 52 
LOK |0 935   |a inmo 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
LOK |0 939   |a 26-12-25  |b l01 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Creative ability,Imitation,Immitation,Imitation,The Creative,Creativity 
STB 0 0 |a Imitation,Imitation,Imitation,Le créatif,Créativité,Créativité,Pensée créative 
STC 0 0 |a Imitación,Imitación,Imitación,Lo creativo,Pensamiento creativo 
STD 0 0 |a Il creativo,Imitazione,Imitazione <motivo>,Imitazione,Emulazione,Emulazione,Emulazione (motivo),Emulazione,Pensiero creativo 
STE 0 0 |a 模仿,仿效,那 创造性的,那 创作的 
STF 0 0 |a 模仿,仿效,那 創造性的,那 創作的 
STG 0 0 |a Imitação,Imitação,Imitação,O criativo,Pensamento criativo 
STH 0 0 |a Имитация (музыка),Копия (мотив),Копия,Креативное мышление,Созидательное 
STI 0 0 |a Απομίμηση (μουσική),Απομίμηση <μοτίβο>,Απομίμηση,Μίμηση,Μίμηση (μοτίβο),Δημιουργική σκέψη,Το Δημιουργικό 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Imitation , Kreativität,Schöpferisches Denken,Produktives Denken