How Did Chinese Buddhists Incorporate Indian Metaphors? A Study of Lushan Huiyuan’s Use of Firewood–Fire Metaphors in the Shadow of Indian Canons

In the discourse of Lushan Huiyuan 廬山慧遠, the firewood–fire metaphor (xinghuozhiyu 薪火之喻) is employed to illustrate personhood (shen 神), referring to pudgala. Scholars often criticize Huiyuan for interpreting personhood as a true “self” (ātman) under the influence of the Vātsīputrīya school, thus cont...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Xin, Fang (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2024
In: Religions
Year: 2024, Volume: 15, Issue: 8
Further subjects:B firewood–fire metaphor
B Āgamas
B Vātsīputrīya school
B personhood ( shen 神)
B pudgala
B Lushan Huiyuan 廬山慧遠
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1898727996
003 DE-627
005 20240826215949.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240815s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel15080986  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1898727996 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1898727996 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Xin, Fang  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0009-0008-4736-7711  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a How Did Chinese Buddhists Incorporate Indian Metaphors? A Study of Lushan Huiyuan’s Use of Firewood–Fire Metaphors in the Shadow of Indian Canons 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the discourse of Lushan Huiyuan 廬山慧遠, the firewood–fire metaphor (xinghuozhiyu 薪火之喻) is employed to illustrate personhood (shen 神), referring to pudgala. Scholars often criticize Huiyuan for interpreting personhood as a true “self” (ātman) under the influence of the Vātsīputrīya school, thus contradicting the doctrine of non-self. This paper suggests that this might be a dual misunderstanding of both Huiyuan and the Vātsīputrīya school. Huiyuan’s firewood–fire metaphor is indeed profoundly influenced by the Vātsīputrīyas’ three kinds of designation. Yet, he never commits to the substantial self, and his argument primarily aims to refute the view of annihilationism (duanmie 斷滅), that is, that life ceases to exist after one period ends. This stance fully aligns with the doctrine of non-self that has been central since the inception of Buddhism. Additionally, Huiyuan’s explanation of the indestructibility of personhood (shen bumie 神不滅) is a reluctant proposition; its fundamental purpose does not lie in discussing transmigration, but rather in demonstrating the state of “body and mind both cease” following the cessation of causes and conditions once “transmigration ends”. 
601 |a Buddhist 
650 4 |a pudgala 
650 4 |a Vātsīputrīya school 
650 4 |a Āgamas 
650 4 |a personhood ( shen 神) 
650 4 |a Lushan Huiyuan 廬山慧遠 
650 4 |a firewood–fire metaphor 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 15(2024), 8, Artikel-ID 986  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2024  |g number:8  |g elocationid:986 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15080986  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/8/986  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4566261328 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1898727996 
LOK |0 005 20240815055504 
LOK |0 008 240815||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-08-14#E31E38687BFE3FE8F81B6D18EC18EAEB56F9CDF8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL